<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Application Security on CybersecurityOS</title><link>http://www.cybersecurityos.net/tags/application-security/</link><description>Recent content in Application Security on CybersecurityOS</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.cybersecurityos.net/tags/application-security/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AWS Security Agent: Continuous Penetration Testing and Threat Modeling for the AI Development Era</title><link>http://www.cybersecurityos.net/posts/os-weekly/aws-security-agent-overview/</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.cybersecurityos.net/posts/os-weekly/aws-security-agent-overview/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most security programs are still built around a calendar, not a codebase. A pen test gets scheduled once or twice a year. A design review happens at a milestone meeting. By the time either one produces a finding, the application it was testing has already shipped four more releases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That mismatch isn&amp;rsquo;t a staffing problem — it&amp;rsquo;s a structural one. AWS&amp;rsquo;s own teams have pointed out that &lt;a href="https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-aws-security-agent-secures-applications-proactively-from-design-to-deployment-preview/"&gt;more than 60% of organizations update their web applications weekly or more often, while nearly 75% test those same applications only monthly or less&lt;/a&gt;. Manual review simply can&amp;rsquo;t move at the speed code ships. &lt;strong&gt;AWS Security Agent&lt;/strong&gt; is AWS&amp;rsquo;s answer to that gap — and it&amp;rsquo;s worth understanding regardless of which cloud you run on, because the underlying shift it represents is bigger than one vendor&amp;rsquo;s product.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>